does this mean that there's no such thing as "good" or "bad" art, only individual taste?

Reading Finnegans Wake with not exellent Engish goes not very easy.

Reading with a lot of unkown words makes the foggy sense. Yet it exists, as stays some sensation (sometimes CutUp like) - and may alter reader state

Reading, permanently looking throght dictionaries, comes slow and breaks the sensation.

Did Joyce suppose, how people will read Wake - thouse, who don't know all used languages?

Seems like a space of information - and known languages seem to narrow the window - what will we see? and if "as above, so below" works, maybe?

I prefer the term 'default' world. I spend so much time on computers I have begun to break things down as 'browsers' and 'operating systems' when it comes to nervous systems. 'Aol' would be the 'sleep', 'unconcious' world. I have met people who think Aol 'is' the internet and so they would like you think. (If your browser is AOL with word filters and porn filters and the like then you interact through a default browser, ie Christianity, trying to explain code to the average AOL user is like trying describing LSD trips to the average uninitiated.